OK, now I'm 20 minutes in, and yes I am drunk, but for FUCK'S sake, why are we trying to define matter in something other than atoms? Gravity has been proven to function to hold together galaxies despite the matter they possess, so what is the scientific justification in inventing the matter that should be there according to previous (and probably incorrect) theories based on less scientific knowledge?
When will current discovery stop apologizing for old theory and make some new ideas of its own?
Excepting the on-a-limb-theory of dark matter, it merely seems as though our (limited) perspective on the exact nature of gravity is keeping us from viewing this dilemma at a larger perspective. What if there is more to causing gravity than a simple presence of mass?
It is simply a question posed by someone who has only passed a basic physics class in college, but according to the scientific method, this kind of question should be asked. It's all about how objective reality can connect with human consciousness and ability to record. Think about it. I'm not an idiot, I promise.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment